An end-to-end BCM platform is easiest to understand as a set of connected modules sharing the same master data. The key design principle is relationship: a critical service should connect to its processes, applications, suppliers, recovery objectives, plans, exercises, incidents and actions.
Module map
| Module | Core records | What it should answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Organization & Services | Business units, locations, products/services, owners, roles | What is in scope and who is accountable? |
| 2. BIA | Impacts, time bands, MTPD/MAO, RTO, RPO, MBCO, minimum resources | What must recover, by when, and why? |
| 3. Dependencies | Applications, data, people, facilities, suppliers, utilities, upstream/downstream processes | What can prevent recovery? |
| 4. Recovery Strategy | Options, chosen strategy, capability, cost, residual risk, approvals | How will requirements be achieved? |
| 5. Plans & Runbooks | Activation, roles, contacts, workarounds, recovery steps, communications | What do teams do during disruption? |
| 6. Exercises | Objectives, scenarios, participants, injects, observations, timings | Have we proved the capability? |
| 7. Actions | Finding, risk, owner, due date, evidence, verification | Are gaps actually being closed? |
| 8. Incident Mode | Activation, tasks, decisions, SITREP/status, milestones, communications | How is recovery progressing now? |
| 9. Dashboards | Coverage, capability, assurance, exposure and trend metrics | Where is management attention required? |
| 10. Administration | Roles, permissions, workflow, taxonomies, notifications, audit trail, integrations | Can the platform be governed securely at scale? |
Organization and critical-service module
Do not treat organization structure as a static address book. A BCM data model should allow services to cross departments, locations and legal entities. Ownership should distinguish service owner, BIA owner, plan owner, technology owner and approver where these roles differ.
BIA module
The BIA module needs more than one RTO field. It should capture impact by time band and category, peak periods, MTPD/MAO, RTO, RPO, MBCO, backlog behavior, minimum staffing, workspace, technology, data, supplier and workaround needs. A reviewer should be able to trace the evidence for each recovery target.
Dependency module
Dependencies should be reusable records. If “Identity Platform A” supports 25 services, store that relationship centrally so risk and change reports can show the 25 affected services. This is much more powerful than repeating the application name in 25 Word documents.
Strategy module
For each recovery requirement, record current capability, options considered, selected strategy, expected recovery performance, implementation owner, cost/effort, approval and residual gap. Strategy records should link to the BIA requirement they are intended to satisfy.
Plan module
Plans should render operational information from structured data while still allowing scenario-specific instructions. They need offline/export options, version control, approvals and fast navigation. During an incident, users should see only the relevant action set, not edit-mode complexity.
Exercises and assurance module
Build an exercise calendar, objectives, scenarios and participant lists. Capture actual results—such as recovery time achieved—and compare them with targets. Corrective actions should be created directly from findings and remain traceable through closure and retest.
Incident mode
Incident mode transforms preparedness data into live operational support: activate affected services/plans, assign tasks, show key contacts, record decisions, maintain event logs and track recovery milestones. Role-based views should prevent information overload.
Metrics and reporting
A dashboard should calculate data quality and capability indicators from the underlying modules rather than depend on manual monthly spreadsheets. Examples: critical-service BIA currency, plan approval coverage, critical supplier assurance, percentage of demonstrated RTOs achieved, open high-risk actions and services with unresolved capability gaps.
Security and integration requirements
Typical enterprise requirements include SSO/MFA, role-based access, tenant or organizational segregation where needed, audit logs, data export, API integration, encryption, backup/restore, retention, configurable workflows and availability during primary-site disruption. HR integration can keep employee ownership current; CMDB/application integration can keep technology dependencies current.
Open the BCM System Playground to move through organization, BIA, strategy, plan, exercise, incident and metrics screens with demo data.
Module-level data ownership
| Module | Business owner | BCM role | Technology / specialist role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Services / organisation | Executive/service owner | Scope and criticality challenge | HR/master-data integration |
| BIA | Service/process owner | Method, challenge, quality assurance | Application/supplier data contributors |
| Dependencies | Service owner + domain owners | Cross-service concentration analysis | CMDB, supplier, facilities, cyber teams |
| Strategy | Service owner / sponsor | Facilitation and evidence | Architecture, HR, facilities, procurement |
| Plans | Operational owner | Template/governance assurance | Runbook owners |
| Exercises | Service owner | Programme, facilitation, evaluation | Technical/supplier participants |
| Incident activation | Incident/crisis lead | BCM plan support | Operations/technology responders |
| Metrics/actions | Accountable executives | Programme reporting | Source-system owners |